GCCQSGreen Certification for Consultations and Quality Solutions

GCCQS — Certification Body

Services · Four lines

Four services. One question: does the evidence support the claim?

  1. 01One method

    The question changes. The method does not.

    A scope agreed in writing, a team matched to your sector, findings tied to evidence, and a report at the end.

Start from the question you have been asked to answer.

The four lines

What each line answers

Four different questions, one set of rules. What is listed under each name is what the engagement includes.

  • Does the system meet the standard?

    Management System Certification

    Third-party auditing of management systems against ISO standards, from application through to annual surveillance.

    • Stage 1 and Stage 2 on site
    • A separate certification decision
    • Three-year surveillance cycle
  • Do the numbers hold up?

    Validation & Verification

    Independent verification of greenhouse-gas inventories and sustainability claims to ISO 14064 and the GHG Protocol.

    • Organisational GHG inventories
    • Project-level validation
    • Activity data tested at source
  • Is it what it is said to be?

    Inspection

    On-site inspection of goods, equipment and works in progress, reported against criteria agreed before we start.

    • A checklist agreed in advance
    • Photographic evidence retained
    • A dated report, named inspector
  • Can your own people do this?

    Training

    Structured training in standards, auditing and reporting, delivered in Arabic or English at your site or ours.

    • Awareness and internal auditor
    • GHG and sustainability reporting
    • Delivered in Arabic or English

Every engagement

Four things hold, whichever line you use

Not features. These are the conditions that make a third-party result worth anything outside your own organisation.

  • The scope is written down first

    Before anyone travels, both sides have agreed what is being assessed, at which sites, and against which standard or framework.

  • People are assigned on competence

    Teams are picked for the sector and the standard, not for who is free that week. Where we are not competent to assess something, we say so.

  • Findings are tied to evidence

    Each finding names what was seen, where, and which requirement it relates to. Anything that is a judgement rather than an observation is labelled as one.

  • The result is a document

    You receive a written report you can act on internally and put in front of a customer, a buyer or a regulator. The outcome is never left as a conversation.

Where a decision or a signed statement is issued, it is taken by someone who did not carry out the work.

Standards and frameworks

Named, not implied

A standard number is a fact, so we print it. Accreditation is a separate matter, and those details will be published here once they are confirmed.

Worked to across the four lines

ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001, ISO 22000, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 50001, ISO 37001, ISO 14064-1

ISO 14064-2, ISO 14064-3, ISO 14065, ISO 14066, ISO/IEC 17020, ISO/IEC 17029, GHG Protocol, CBAM

Next step

Start with the scope

Send what needs assessing, the standard or framework involved, and how many sites are in play. We confirm whether we are competent to do the work, then quote the time it genuinely takes.